The Global Salmon Initiative (GSI)
Global
What is it?
Representing approximately 40% of the global farmed salmon sector, the Global Salmon Initiative (GSI) is a leadership initiative established by leading farmed salmon CEOs from around the world who share a vision of providing a healthy and sustainable source of protein to feed a growing population, while minimizing their environmental footprint, and continuing to improve their social and economic contribution.
Through global collaboration and research, pooling of resources, and sharing of knowledge, the GSI aims to make significant improvements across the industry in terms of social responsibility, environmental impact, and social contributions.
Focus areas are:
- ASC certification;
- Carbon footprint;
- Sustainable feed;
- Biosecurity;
- Social responsibility; and,
- The future of aquaculture.
Improvements – Sustainable feed
Through partnerships with its Associate Members – BioMar, Cargill, Skretting, and Salmofood, and their work with the ASC, the GSI hopes to accelerate the development of new solutions and approaches to improving the sustainability of feed ingredients, while maintaining its position as an industry leader in environmental performance.
Under their sustainable feed focus, GSI members are focusing on the sustainable sourcing of krill, innovation in feed ingredients, improvements in forage fish dependency ratios (FFDR) and feed conversion rates (FCR), optimizing the use of by-products, finding alternative sources of Omega-3 fatty acids, and support the ASC feed standard.
As part of the GSI mission to achieve 100% ASC certification, its members will incorporate this additional standard into their responsible sourcing practices.
Note that ASC-certified farms have until October 2025 to transition to ASC-compliant feed produced under the ASC Feed Standard to continue to meet the ASC Farm Standards.
Their members and associate feed companies will use this standard as a framework to promote greater transparency in the supply chain and ensure that all ingredients are responsibly sourced.
Sourcing of feed ingredients
GSI member companies, alongside their feed associate members, are committed to:
- Ensuring all krill are harvested responsibly to preserve stocks, under strict supervision in line with regulated catch limits set by The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Any instance of bycatch is unacceptable and should result in immediate changes to processes and best practices by certification bodies to prevent another incident and to ensure responsible practices are not compromised.
- Sourcing only MarinTrust or MSC-certified Antarctic krill.
- Supporting the creation of marine protected areas, including no-fishing areas in the Antarctic.
- Continuing to evaluate alternative ingredients to replicate the nutritional benefits krill provide, such as algae.
- Working with the ASC feed standard to ensure all feed ingredients are sourced from only responsible feed companies.
GSI members and feed companies also support and participate in several policies and initiatives at both a company and industry level to ensure sustainable, and responsible sourcing of soy.
This includes:
- Sourcing soy from deforestation-free soybeans and palm products and purchasing Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), ProTerra, or equivalently certified products
- Many GSI members are partnered with third-party projects including Cerrado Manifesto, and the Round Table of Responsible Soy.
- Several GSI members have stated their unequivocal support for the Amazon Soy Moratorium (ASM) in Brazil.
- Some members have also joined forces with ProTerra and Brazilian soy producers to show their commitment to responsible soy production. The ‘Aquaculture Dialogue on Sustainable Soy Sourcing from Brazil’ group discusses improvements in traceability, transparency, supplier code of conduct, and deforestation.
- Members also have their projects and initiatives, including internal education, geo-mapping, and risk assessments to identify the sources of the soybeans they use and the risks of deforestation in those areas
- The ASC has developed a new ASC Feed Standard which includes guidance and reporting on feed ingredients, including soy. As part of the GSI mission to achieve 100% ASC certification, its members will incorporate this additional standard into their responsible sourcing practices.
Climate Change
Members of the GSI are also committed to reducing their carbon footprint across their operations and supply chains. They are working with the WWF to establish a standardized GHG accounting framework for the salmon farming sector, and applying it to the broader aquaculture sector.
Through standardized accounting and aligned data collection, they will identify opportunities for mitigation and then use the GSI pre-competitive model to share better practices and lessons learned to accelerate the reductions.
They use the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) as their accounting framework.
They also partner with IDH, the Sustainable Trade Initiative, and are piloting data collection through the IDH Aquaculture Working Group on Environmental Footprint tool designed to support data gathering according to this framework.
- Transparency
- Restorative land use and biodiversity practices
- Climate footprint
- Circularity
- Pollution
- Fisheries
- Water consumption
- Fish health and nutrition
- Human nutrition and health
- Basic human rights
- Climate change impacts
- Governance
- Scalability
- Feed of the Future: Transparent and Traceable – WWF Business Case
- What Gets Measured Gets Managed: Aquaculture ESG Feed Ingredient Risk Tool – World Aquaculture Society Magazine, March edition 2024
What is it?
The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risk assessment tool or ESG screen for feed ingredients aims to improve the visibility of aquaculture feed supply chains, allowing stakeholders to better identify and address possible ESG risks associated with the many ingredients feed contains.
It recognizes that without knowing the composition of the feed, it is impossible to know the ESG risks that may be embedded within it.
It was developed over a three-year consultation period between GSI members, WWF, and industry feed companies.
It can also help companies assess the scalability of potential alternative or novel ingredients allowing stakeholders to make more informed sourcing decisions aligned with their strategic priorities, values, and commitments.
The tool was initially developed and trialed by WWF and Grieg Seafood and provides a standardized framework for farming companies and other aquaculture supply chain members to engage with feed manufacturers to get a holistic overview of possible risks in the feed supply chain.
As a result, it aligns the sustainability asks put to feed manufacturers, making the resulting information comparable across different companies and ingredients. It also reduces the time taken requesting sustainability information by aquaculture supply chain members and feed buyers and the time taken by feed companies responding to these.
Although the tool was designed to support the salmon farming sector, other animal protein production sectors (including those of other aquaculture species groups would also benefit from its use.
The Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) has also reviewed the tool and intends to incorporate it as one of its due diligence mechanisms to be part of the ASC Feed Standard certification process.
The tool is composed of the following assessment topics and is subdivided into questions associated with each of these:
To create the tool, WWF and Grieg Seafood worked closely with feed suppliers to address the lack of transparency in feed formulation. This process involved navigating complex non-disclosure agreements across a variety of stakeholders so that the appropriate feed information could be gathered while maintaining confidentiality.
They learned the following ten ingredients make up the vast majority of feed volume: beans and peas, fish meal, fish oil, guar, rapeseed oil, soybean meal, soy protein concentrate, sunflower, wheat, and wheat gluten.
The tool was originally applied to four ingredients, but after initial testing has now been expanded to nine. It will continue to be refined in collaboration with WWF, GSI, Grieg Seafood, other protein producers, and feed manufacturers to support further ESG improvements in the supply chain.
Its ultimate goal is to move from an Excel spreadsheet to a cloud-based platform to reduce any potential human error, streamline the process, and reduce the burden and redundancies for feed manufacturers.
You can learn more about the aims, development history, and future of the tool by viewing
You can also contact GSI and WWF